police brutality lawyer chicago | Dinizulu Law Group, Ltd

CHICAGO, IL – Police body camera footage was released on Tuesday and shows what happened to an innocent woman nearly two years ago when police officers wrongly entered her home with guns drawn and handcuffed her naked while she watched the horrific scene unfold.

Anjanette Young filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request last year and recently obtained the footage after a court ordered the Chicago Police Department to turn it over as part of her lawsuit against police, according to CBS Chicago.

The video shows on Feb. 21, 2019, nine body cameras caught a group of male officers entering Young’s home at 7 p.m. Young had just finished her shift as a licensed social worker at a hospital and was undressing in her bedroom when she heard a loud, pounding noise.

Officers repeatedly struck her door with a battering ram. From various angles of the footage, the video captured the moment officers broke her door down.

Young remembers officers yelling, “Police! Search warrant,” and “Hands up.” Moments later, Young is seen naked in the living room with her hands up. An officer can be seen eventually handcuffing her.

“What is going on?” Young yells in the video. “There’s nobody else here, I live alone. You’ve got the wrong house.”

An officer found a blanket and wrapped it around Young as she cried asking officers who they were looking for. The blanket began to slide off and expose her body in which no officer made an attempt to cover her.

Young can be heard telling police at least 43 times they were in the wrong home. She asked police to allow her to get dressed and informed them they had the wrong information.

“Oh my god, this cannot be right. How is this legal?” Young said during the raid.

According to CPD’s complaint for a search warrant, a confidential informant told the lead officer of the raid that he recently saw a 23-year-old man who was a known felon with a gun and ammunition.

The officer found a photo of the suspect in a police database and showed it to the informant, who then confirmed that was him. The officer drove the informant to the address where the informant claimed the suspect lived.

Despite police making no effort to independently verify the informant’s tip, such as conducting surveillance or any other policy checks, the search warrant was approved by an assistant state’s attorney and judge.

The informant gave police the wrong address; the suspect police were looking for lived in the unit next door to Young’s and had no connection to her.

Body camera footage also raises questions about the approval of the warrant. In one clip, officers can be heard talking saying the warrant was not initially approved.

“What does that mean?” the second officer asked.

“I have no idea,” the first officer said. “They said it was approved, then I guess that person messed up on their end.”

This is not the first time police have failed to do basic routine checks regarding bad information given by an informant.

Young said the way officers treated and spoke to her during the raid caused her experience to be more traumatic. You can see in the footage she’s visibly upset pleading with officers to tell her what was going on.

The sergeant asked Young if there were any firearms in her home.

“There’s no guns in here,” she said. “I’ve been a social worker for 20 years. I follow the lwa. I don’t get in trouble for anything. I don’t do illegal stuff. I’m not that person. You have the wrong information.”

The sergeant told the affiant officer – the officer who received the warrant – to step outside.

“I want to have a conversation with you,” the sergeant said.

Moments later, the officer’s body camera turned off.

After nearly 20 minutes, police remove the handcuffs. Towards the end of the raid, the sergeant apologized to Young.

“I apologize for bothering you tonight,” the sergeant tells Young. “I assure you the city will be in contact with you tomorrow. I apologize for meeting you this way. I will do everything I can to get the door fixed.”

Young said it was “surreal” to watch the footage back two years later. She continues to live with trauma and leans on church and her faith for support. She believes she has a responsibility to use her voice to protect others from being in the same situation.

CHICAGO, IL – George Floyd died tragically before the world’s eyes last Monday when a video went viral of four Minneapolis police officers handcuffed him and Derek Chauvin kneeled on Floyd’s neck while two other officers held him down. In the video, you can hear Floyd repeatedly tell officers, “Please, please, please, I can’t breathe,” that sparked condemnation, protests, and a national outcry.

All four officers were terminated and are under investigation by the F.B.I. Derek Chauvin was charged on Friday with third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter. Minnesota’s attorney general Keith Ellison said the four officers involved will be charged to the “highest level of accountability” (New York Post).

Floyd’s family conducted their own private autopsy through independent pathologists, as well as the county medical examiner – both of which state he died by homicide; however, the two autopsy reports differed on how exactly Floyd died. Dr. Allecia Wilson, one of the pathologists that conducted the independent autopsy, said that Floyd died as a result of mechanical asphyxiation. The report by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner’s office stated Floyd died of “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression. The manner of death was ruled as a homicide, but the medical examiner’s review “revealed no physical findings that support a diagnosis of traumatic asphyxia or strangulation.”

This has raised many questions from the public – why have the other officers who were involved not charged? Will they be charged with murder? The private autopsy shows Floyd was killed on the scene and died in front of our eyes due to the pressure of Chauvin kneeling into his neck and from the two officers holding him down, pressing him lungs into the pavement, which interfered with blood flow to his heart and brain.

The Hennepin County medical examiner’s office said Floyd experienced cardiopulmonary arrest while being restrained by the officers. The county autopsy said Floyd had other significant conditions including “arteriosclerotic and hypertensive heart disease; fentanyl intoxication; and recent methamphetamine use.” The office had not previously released their findings pending toxicology reports.

Dr. Michael Baden, a pathologist of the independent autopsy, stated further testing wouldn’t reveal evidence of compressive pressure on Floyd’s neck, back, and legs since the pressure would have been released when it was no longer applied. He mentioned that large areas of scraped and abrasions on Floyd’s face indicated the force was used to press him into the ground.

Benjamin Crump, a civil rights lawyer representing the Floyd family, said, “What those officers did, as we have seen on the video, is his cause of death – not some underlying, unknown health condition. George Floyd was a healthy young man. The ambulance was his hearse.”